Lawyer questions Sam Bankman-Fried on his political donations at trial

Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried’s protection lawyer Mark Cohen heard testimony from the previous FTX CEO on his relationship with Caroline Ellison and political donations from the crypto trade.

In response to studies from the courtroom on Oct. 27, Bankman-Fried claimed to not have mentioned donations to U.S. politicians with former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh and former FTX Digital Markets co-CEO Ryan Salame. SBF reportedly stated the donations made in his identify got here from “loans from Alameda Analysis” as a part of efforts to affect U.S. authorities’s insurance policies on regulating crypto.

“[…] I believed coverage was necessary. Congress and the chief department… Some have been [supportive of] FTX for cryptocurrency lobbying. Some, not most.”

Cohen additionally posed extra private questions seemingly unrelated to the allegations SBF was going through in court docket. The protection lawyer requested Bankman-Fried what led to the top of his relationship with Ellison.

“She needed greater than I might give,” the previous FTX CEO reportedly stated, referring to Ellison. “It wasn’t the primary time with me.”

Throughout her testimony, Ellison said the relationship ended as SBF “wasn’t spending a lot time” together with her. Cohen requested the previous FTX CEO the explanations behind his model, with SBF replying his hair was the results of him being “lazy” whereas he discovered sporting shorts and T-shirts on most events “comfy.”

Associated: Sam Bankman-Fried trial moves to final stages

In earlier testimony on Oct. 27, the previous CEO reportedly denied defrauding FTX users by directing efforts at Alameda permitting the agency to make use of buyer funds. Former FTX chief expertise officer Gary Wang and others supplied testimony claiming SBF had given Alameda the power to commerce extra funds than it had accessible.

Bankman-Fried’s testimony will possible finish by early subsequent week following cross-examination by attorneys with the U.S. Division of Justice. Barring addressing any motions or authorized hiccups, the court docket will then possible instruct the jury to deliberate on the seven legal costs.

Journal: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?